+27 83 629-7690 henrypool7@gmail.com
Let us make CO2 great again!

Let us make CO2 great again!

As the love affair with so-called green energy cools and “net zero” commitments to eliminate “carbon emissions” wane, so we see glimmers of acknowledgment for the benefits of more carbon dioxide. That’s right: More people are beginning to understand that the gas – widely demonized as a pollutant endangering Earth with excessive heat – is a life-giving substance needed in greater amounts.

U.S. voters know that President-elect Donald Trump has declared the Green New Deal a “scam” and promises to return common sense to environmental regulations and energy development. His return to office rests partly on that pledge.

In Europe, German politicians whose green fetish has produced economic decline face serious electoral challenges. And developing countries like India ignore “decarbonization” promises to aggressively develop coal mines and import more of the fuel to spur growth and eradicate poverty.

Less frequently reported is the story of carbon dioxide emissions greening the Earth and boosting crop production. Educating the public on the benefits of carbon dioxide is the mission of the CO2 Coalition, which I lead. We sponsor speakers and publish scientifically based materials for adults and children. Much of the information is about the role of CO2 as a beneficial greenhouse gas in moderating the extremes between daytime and nighttime temperatures and as a photosynthetic plant food.

“Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest Energy Sources” by Dr. Indur Goklany is an example of our work. Did you know that up to 50% of the globe has experienced an increase in vegetation and that 70% of the greening is attributed to plant fertilization by carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels? Or that nearly 200,000 square kilometers of the southern Sahara have been converted to a lush grassland from desert?

Few have heard that doubling atmospheric CO2 from its current concentration of 420 ppm would significantly increase agricultural productivity and have little effect on the climate. It appears that some of this knowledge has reached Canada because Alberta’s ruling Unified Conservative Party (UCP) recently approved a resolution that promotes the salutary effects of CO2 and endorses an outright rejection of the national government’s net zero policy.

“It is estimated that (atmospheric) CO2 levels need to be above 150 ppm (parts per million) to ensure the survival of plant life,” says the proposal for a resolution eventually adopted by the party. “The Earth needs more CO2 to support life and to increase plant yields, both of which will contribute to the health and prosperity of all Albertans.”

The UCP calls for abandoning CO2’sdesignation as a pollutant and for recognizing the gas as “a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.” The UCP’s action was not well received by the likes of DeSmog, an online platform of climate alarmists, which called the party’s resolution “a brazen display of climate science denial that harkens back to the 1990s fossil fuel industry playbook.”

DeSmog reported that the UCP had credited the “notorious” CO2 Coalition as its source of information – much to our gratification, Except for the politically connected in the climate industrial complex, the carbon footprint phobia of recent years is a threat to everybody’s economic wellbeing. But it is a direct assault on a place like Alberta.

Perhaps second only to the Canadian Rockies, the most distinguishing natural resource of the western province is its huge deposit of oil sands – the world’s fourth largest proven reserve of “black gold.” Employing nearly 140,000 people and generating $17 billion in royalties, the oil industry is valued by Albertans.

“The problem is net zero has become a shorthand for ‘leave it in the ground,’” says Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. She plans to fight “the federal government and a coalition of extreme environmentalists who want to stop the production of oil and gas altogether.”

It is a good day when we find ourselves on the side of people fighting for the freedom to prosper as they contribute to the atmospheric store of carbon dioxide that enriches ecosystems and engenders life. To paraphrase Donald Trump: Let’s make CO2 great again.

Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist and executive director of the CO2 coalition, see  https://co2coalition.org/

 and author of “Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know” and “A Very Convenient Warming: How modest warming and more CO2 are benefiting humanity.

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Take an hour or so to find out why we are being swindled for ‘climate research’ and how people living in Africa are having to suffer without gas and oil for electricity.

Or take 15 minutes to watch how the media in the past have alarmed the world with hoaxes about changing weather.

More Carbon dioxide is good for you

There is not enough CO₂ in our atmosphere. Yes, you read that right. According to the scientists from the organization The CO₂ Coalition, we are currently in a period with record low CO₂, contrary to what governments, the IPCC and our media have been telling us for decades now. In fact, it’s a good thing that we’ve already climbed up a bit since the lowest level ever measured. Because if we fall back and perhaps even fall below that level, an absolute disaster is imminent: the extinction of plant life on this planet – and with it all life.

CO₂ is good for you.

These scientists know for sure. Who or what is this CO₂ Coalition that they dare to swim against the tide?

Critical scientists

Well, it doesn’t just come out of the blue, that scientific group. Their initiative stems from the George C. Marshall Institute, a conservative American think tank that saw the light of day in 1984, named after the man behind the famous Marshall Plan. The institute, which closed in 2015, has been critical of prevailing views on climate since 1989, and the CO₂ Coalition seems to be a successor to this think tank that several scientists from the Marshall Institute have taken part in or even participated in its creation. And the goal remains unchanged: to provide the climate lobby with science-based criticism.

Their findings are very different from those of the IPCC – and seem to make a lot more sense when we compare it to the observable facts. And when it comes to the panic about ‘too much CO₂ in the air’, their conclusions are clear: not only is that nonsense, but the opposite is true. The CO₂ concentrations are rather low, say these scientists.

CO₂ is not air pollution

In recent years, CO₂ is portrayed to us as a form of air pollution, as a result of how dirty we live, and that’s nonsense, of course, because CO₂ is naturally formed.

If humanity did not exist, there would still be CO₂ in the atmosphere. It’s colorless and odorless, so I don’t immediately see the polluting aspect. That’s not to say that it can’t be harmful: plenty of things that this earth naturally produces that can be an outright poison for us as humans, such as certain plants, minerals or gases.

But CO₂ is one of the most important factors when it comes to life on this planet: without CO₂, this planet would be a dead, cold rock. The more CO₂, the greener the planet becomes. And the greener the planet is, the healthier and more numerous life will be among all that greenery. CO₂ is a molecule of life that has made the miracle of life on this beautiful planet possible and helps sustain it every day.

Amount of CO₂

The amount of CO₂ is indicated in ppm: parts per million. It indicates, per million molecules, how many of those million molecules are CO₂ molecules: at the moment there are just over 400 on average. To keep it in clear percentages: 0.04% of all molecules in the atmosphere are CO₂ molecules. If we consider that CO₂ is one of the most important building blocks of all life on our planet, that is not a high number: less than a tenth of a percent.

The current climate lobby is right about one thing: it is true that CO₂ levels have risen somewhat in the last three hundred years. Before the start of the industrial revolution, the average content was even lower: around 280 ppm. But what the scientists at The CO2 Coalition claim is that this is precisely the dangerous exception: there is far too little CO₂ in the atmosphere. If that level gets close to 150 ppm, plant life starts to die, they say. And it should be clear that if the plants on this planet die, the rest of life will not have a chance either.

Carbon averages in our era are decidedly low compared to other times, says The CO2 Coalition. And it takes a long time to put that in context: according to this organization, the average CO₂ level of the past 800,000 years was ‘only’ 230 ppm, whereas in the 600 million years before that it had an average of 2600 ppm. That’s a big difference.

Our planet was once a great big green jungle. It was man who literally put the axe to this: in order to survive, man, who domesticated at an early age, simply has to engage in agriculture. And agriculture takes up space, especially given the fact that humanity expanded rather quickly thanks to domestication. The Europe of the early Middle Ages, before large-scale deforestation began, was a lot greener and wilder than it is today: CO₂ is food for plants and the more of it is in the air, the better plant life on earth develops. The question of how it is possible that the planet was once so much more vegetated than it is now can only be explained by considerable CO₂ levels, in periods when humans were far from manufacturing and combustion engines, is one that is surprisingly little asked.

CO₂ fertilization

Higher levels of CO₂ in our atmosphere are therefore beneficial for many plant species, including many of the plants that provide us with food. It’s called CO₂ fertilization, CO₂ fertilization, and it  literally makes plants bigger and stronger. Their photosynthesis is better, their resistance to diseases and pests increases, the fact that they are getting bigger ensures that they quickly overshadow competing weeds and manage to overgrow them, and so on.

And that’s good news for the world’s ever-existing hunger: it means more harvests, bigger harvests, of healthier plants with more volume. With literally more nutritional value. This means that more food can be obtained from the same amount of hectares of agricultural land. And that too with less use of all kinds of chemical pesticides, thanks to the fact that those plants are not so easily affected by all kinds of enemies. That’s a fantastic win.

Drought

And not only that: plants are better able to withstand periods of drought at higher CO₂ levels. Because plants, just like us, have kind of pores, stomata, Plants absorb moisture and nutrients through these stomata, but they also lose them through these stomata. Research shows that a plant makes fewer and smaller stomata with more CO₂ – and is therefore able to retain internal moisture and absorbed nutrients longer and better, so that such a plant can keep itself alive better in the absence of precipitation. Again, this is great news, because it means a lot of new opportunities for agriculture in drier areas.

And it is visible, the effect of the rising CO₂ averages of the past three centuries: the planet is gloriously green. Interestingly, this piece from NASA says  that CO₂ explains 70% of that greening, and that the second important factor is nitrogen.

But in any case, I can’t imagine that there are any major objections to the fact that our planet is becoming greener and greener – it’s very healthy. CO₂ provides that greening that we all desperately need, so that the ecological balances remain in order.

Is CO₂ dangerous?

Is it dangerous, high concentrations of CO₂ in the air? The websites that try to explain this are rather panicky about it: CO₂ levels above 1000 ppm are no longer good for us. We are already getting drowsy, and if those levels go up a bit, between 2000 and 5000 ppm, then things really start to go wrong, they say. Headaches, fatigue, poor concentration, increased heart rate and so on.

Strangely enough, these phenomena cannot be observed in party halls where hundreds of people are dancing and dancing energetically and in good spirits and where, thanks to all those sweating, breathing people, the CO₂ levels can rise considerably. On a more serious note, the level of CO₂ in a submarine can  reach 8000 ppm (0.8%), which is considered normal. An environment in which these men can function at peak capacity, because that is what you can expect from the well-trained military personnel of a very expensive and dangerous submarine. So the question of what really dangerous CO₂ levels are: it seems that it’s just not that very harmful. This website of the Minnesota Health Department also says (a rare exception, because the panic is high on most sites): CO₂ poisoning is very rare.

Beer and parties

And was I just talking about partying? Because a party without CO₂ is not a party. A beer alone contains 6000 ppm and if you opt for something more expensive, such as champagne – a particularly festive drink – you drink a whopping 12,000 ppm CO₂. And what about the festive contributions that CO₂ can make to your party in other ways through great effects? Dry ice, that mighty beautiful stuff for Halloween parties, because it comes off that veil smoke that then mops up the floor so ghostly: is just frozen CO₂. And the CO₂ guns are also becoming increasingly popular: beautiful fog in the room between the partygoers to increase the revelry: it‘s a real business.

CO₂ is not a deadly poison gas, CO₂ will not mean the demise of this planet or that of humanity – CO₂ is a molecule of life to which we owe just about everything we are, do and own. So folks: isn’t it time we started realizing that without CO₂ we are literally and figuratively nowhere?

Say it out aloud: CO-two is good for you!

***

IWritten by Ines van Bokhoven.

OpinieZ: OpinieZ Er zit juist te weinig CO₂ in onze atmosfeer

 

 

Heart for Children Newsletter 24.10.2024

Isaiah 40:31: “But those who wait on the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles. They shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint.”

We know this promise by Yahweh to the people of God by heart, yet we do not accept His promise fully. This is the time of year when we complain that we feel so tired. So much has happened during this year, like wars, natural disasters, politics, and, closer to home, the various challenges in our own lives. I believe we can only confirm that what happens in our personal lives is what affects us the most. Some of us struggle with our health, or experience financial constraints. Looking back at the past year we may realize that in most cases we have tried to solve our problems in our own way. We have not yet reached the point where we fully let go and let God take over. I often think that we, as the children of God, become so embroiled in our own problems that we tend to peck in the dirt like chickens. Isaiah reminds us to wait on the Lord, who shall renew our strength. If we trust in Yahweh and get up from the dirt, we shall soar above our weariness. Let us search for Godly strength and encouragement in these last weeks before this year comes to an end.

Accomplishment for 2024

As we have reported before, God has been faithful, and Heart for Children collected sufficient funds to provide gas stoves to all homes of the Rehoboth Children’s village plus complete solar power for the education-, distribution- and activity center, respectively. This will make them less dependent on power from ESKOM so that most activities can carry on if there is a power outage.

However, our finances have dwindled to the extent where we are unable to meet our monthly expenses and regular monthly payments to those homes that we are supporting. We therefore urge you, our donors, to open your heart. Heart for Children needs your monthly financial support, otherwise we will have to cut back, which will be to the detriment of the children we support.

Proposal for a new project for this summer

Our financial director, Philip Nicholson, has recently been asked to join the board of the “Guardians of Hope” (GoH), an organization that facilitates rescue and assistance in East London to a maximum of ca. 30 babies and small children. The board of Heart for Children has considered a new project for the next six months collecting donations for GoH, providing for as much baby formula (milk), baby food and nappies as possible. Please take a few minutes to watch this video:

https://youtu.be/Kr5W3muo57c

For more information, you can also go to the GoH website: Guardians of Hope | Place of safety

Will you help? We will take pictures of the goods supplied, so that you can be assured of where your contributions are going. Please remember that this project is in addition to the homes that we are already supporting.  Here is what to do: Please make a (n) (extra) donation to Heart for Children. In the reference, please give your name, surname and the word: ‘hope’. That way we will be able to allocate your donation going to the ‘Guardians of Hope’ project. Please click here for more information on how to donate: DONATE | Heart for Children

May God bless you richly,

Henry and Annette Pool

0836297690, henrypool7@gmail.com

Henry’s Blog | Bread on the water

0834696875, annette.pool@gmail.com

NEWS | Heart for Children

 

 

Judgement day

The Sheep and the Goats

31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory.

32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.

33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.

35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,

36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?

38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you?

39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40 “The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’

41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,

43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45 “He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”   Matt 25:31-46 (NIV) 

In this speech Jesus goes further than all the prophets before Him by telling us exactly on what basis we all will be judged one day. Summarized in one sentence, it is simply whether we did or did not have compassion for our fellow man in need. It is not only material needs such as food and clothes that could be referred to here. Maybe someone is looking for spiritual assistance. (Matthew 28:18-20). Then we could talk with him or her about the Living Water (John 4:10) or the Bread of Life (John 6:35). Whatever a person’s problem may be; our wish is always that someone meets Jesus in us. We can accomplish this by determining the exact need and then to provide in that need if one has the means and the ability to do so. If we cannot help, we should consider praying for that particular need.  

By loving our neighbour we are doing the work of God. (Matt. 22:39). We must never forget this. It must be possible to measure our faith in Him by the (positive) effect it has on the people around us, such as family, friends, our church and even our city and country. Some people and churches are inclined to shift the emphasis on other issues: How you dress or how you wear your hair, to which church you go, what you may or may not eat, whether a woman may lead a church, whether you are white or black, whether you may work on a Sunday or even whether you should go to church on a Sunday or a Saturday. There is more that I could mention, such as those issues related to the certain rites and sacraments in the various Christian denominations. However, to Jesus, all these things do not seem to be very important on the day the world ends. (vs 35-36). 

The big difference between Christianity and any other religion is that Jesus has already won; the price has already been paid. We don’t have to try and ‘earn’ something. Rather the sacrifice that He brought for us, namely Himself, and the examples that He set, inspire us, His disciples, to do the work of God. It seems to me that all our love for people originates from our love for Him. 

It is interesting to note that Jesus does not mention that faith as such (in Himself) is a prerequisite to righteousness. It must be true then: Faith without works is dead (James 2:14).  You should be able to show or prove your faith from your works (James 2:17,18). Somebody asked me once what I thought of a medical doctor who (says he) does not believe in God but goes to a developing country and spends a few years there to help the people for free. My answer to this was: “I admire the medical doctor,  but I would doubt very much whether this person really does not believe in God. To show that kind of commitment to the plight of the poor proves to me that he does have faith. Maybe he says that he does not believe in God because he is still searching. (Most people, who have not yet found God, are usually searching for the truth, because when you meet with them they always seem to bring the subject up). Jesus says: ‘Seek and you will find.’ So, I am convinced that he will find God, even if that meeting with Him will still be in the future.”